Can we really justify a government in circumventing civil laws when it is vital to the protection of national security? While some people argue that there are extremely important situations such as the protection of national affairs, where the governments are justified in bypassing civil laws, others would state that there are not exceptions no matter how vital the situation is. It is clear that there are occasions where governments should be able to circumvent civil laws in order to protect the nation.
Those that would argue that governments should not be allowed to circumvent civil laws might think that these exceptions may make certain people are above the law and this consequently would lead to corruption. terrorism as an extreme situation where the government
0 comments:
Post a Comment